Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jalandhar I,...

Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jalandhar I, Jalandhar v. M/S Doaba Cooperative Sugar Mills Limited, Nawanshahr

High Court 19 May 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jalandhar I, Jalandhar v. M/S Doaba Cooperative Sugar Mills Limited, Nawanshahr
Date of order
19 May 2011
Assessment year(s)
1997-98
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jalandhar I, Jalandhar v. M/S Doaba Cooperative Sugar Mills Limited, Nawanshahr, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH ITA No.845 of 2010Date of decision: 19.5.2011 Commissioner of Income Tax, Jalandhar I, Jalandhar ... Appellant Versus M/s Doaba Cooperative Sugar Mills Limited, Nawanshahr ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOELACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL Present:Mr. Vivek Sethi, Sr.Standing counsel for the appellant. Adarsh Kumar Goel, ACJ. This order will dispose of ITA Nos.845 and 846 of 2010 asboth the appeals involve common question. ITA No.845 of 2010 has been preferred by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) againstthe order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Amritsar Bench,Amritsar in ITA No.502(ASR)/2000 for the assessment year 1997-98,claiming following substantial questions of law:- “i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of thecase, the ITAT is right in law in expressing the plaindivergence from the earlier view held by the Divisionalbench of the jurisdictional High Court in KarnalCooperative Sugar Mills Limited, (2001) 253 ITR 659 (P&H) as held in the case of the Budhewal CooperativeSugar Limited v. CIT 225 CTR 261 (P&H)? ii) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances and in lawa cooperative society, engaged in the business ofmanufacturing and sale of sugar out of sugarcane can besaid to be engaged in the marketing of the agriculturalproduce of its members within the meaning of section 80-P(2) (a) (iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961?” Learned counsel for the revenue fairly states that the matteris covered against the revenue by judgment of this Court in TheBudhewal Cooperative Sugar Limited v. CIT, 225 CTR 261. Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed. (Adarsh Kumar Goel)Acting Chief Justice May 19, 2011‘gs’ (Ajay Kumar Mittal)Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan