Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jalandhar-Ii, Jalandhar v. Saroj Singhania
High Court
25 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jalandhar-Ii, Jalandhar v. Saroj Singhania
Date of order
25 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jalandhar-Ii, Jalandhar v. Saroj Singhania, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH
ITA No. 333 of 2007 Decided on : 25.01.2016
Commissioner of Income Tax, Jalandhar-II, Jalandhar
Versus
Saroj Singhania
. . . Appellant
. . . Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAJ RAHUL GARG
PRESENT: Mr. Vivek Sethi, Advocatefor the appellant-revenue.
Mr. Divya Suri, Advocate and Mr. Sachin Bhardwaj, Advocatefor the respondent.
****
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue states that since the taxeffect involved is ` 8,05,347/-. Although he has no instructions to withdrawthe present appeal but keeping in view of the circular No.21/2015, dated10.12.2015 issued by the C.B.D.T., New Delhi, the present appeal may bedismissed as withdrawn. However, liberty be granted to the revenue to file anapplication for revival of the appeal in case something survives therein.
2.Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It is, however,clarified that withdrawal of the appeal by the revenue shall not be taken to beaffirmation of order of the Tribunal on merits. Further, the legal issue asclaimed by the revenue is being left open to be adjudicated in an appropriatecase.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
January 25, 2016
J.Ram
(RAJ RAHUL GARG) JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.