Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jamshedpur v. Sri Mangilal Chawla
High Court
13 Oct 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jhar_pg
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jamshedpur v. Sri Mangilal Chawla
Date of order
13 Oct 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jamshedpur v. Sri Mangilal Chawla, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.
Issue: Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ITAT was correct and justified in upholding the order of CIT (A) who deleted the addition vide his order dated 24.12.2004 on the ground that there was no undisclosed income in the case of respondent on the basis of inadequate and insuffi...
Decision: Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ITAT was correct and justified in upholding the order of CIT (A) who deleted the addition vide his order dated 24.12.2004 on the ground that there was no undisclosed income in the case of respondent on the basis of inadequate and insuffi...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
T.A. No. 11 of 2007
---
Commissioner of Income Tax, Jamshedpur--- ---
---Appellant
Versus
Sri Mangilal Chawla
--
--
-- Respondent
---
Coram: Hon'ble the Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh
---
For the Appellant: Mr. Deepak Roshan, Advocates
For the Respondent: Mr. Binod Poddar, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Ajay Poddar, Advocate
---
Order No. 06Dated 28th November 2013
---
Heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned counsel for the
respondent.
This appeal is admitted for hearing on the following substantial question of
law.
A. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ITAT was correct and justified in upholding the order of CIT (A) who deleted the addition vide his order dated 24.12.2004 on the ground that there was no undisclosed income in the case of respondent on the basis of inadequate and insufficient evidence furnished by the respondent regarding earning of income to the extent of Rs. 14,95,428/-?B. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, where the respondent merely accepts an income as having arisen to it without initiating any steps in making disclosure thereof by filing a return of income, the relatable income is liable to be excluded from the undisclosed income if the accrual of income is detected in the course of search & seizure action carried out in its case?
(R. Banumathi, C.J.)
(Aparesh Kumar Singh, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.