Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jodhpur v. Order
High Court
02 May 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jodhpur v. Order
Date of order
02 May 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jodhpur v. Order, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR
D.B. Income Tax Ref. No. 4 / 2001
Commissioner of Income Tax, Jodhpur
----Petitioner
Versus
M/s. Ajay & Others Trust, C/o. M/s. Aryan Pipe Traders, InsideSojati Gate, Jodhpur.----RespondentConnected With1. D.B. Income Tax Ref. No.1/2001 CIT Vs. M/s. Ajay & Ors Trust 2. D.B. Income Tax Ref. No.5/2001 CIT Vs. M/s. Ajay & Ors Trust 3. D.B. Income Tax Ref. No.6/2001 CIT Vs. M/s. Ajay & Ors Trust _____________________________________________________
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. K.K. Bissa
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sanjay NaharMr. Manish Shishodia_____________________________________________________
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
02/05/2017
In light of Circular No.21/2015 dated 10.12.2015 issued bythe Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board ofDirect Taxes, Government of India, New Delhi read with
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
clarification dated 08.3.2016, these references are not requiredto be answered and are required to be treated as withdrawn.
Dismissed accordingly.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR)J. (GOVIND MATHUR)J.Sanjay
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.