Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kerala v. Associated Fibre And Rubber Industries (P) Ltd

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KERALA v. ASSOCIATED FIBRE AND RUBBER INDUSTRIES (P) LTD; FEBRUARY 3, 1999 [M. SRINIVASAN AND U.C. BANERJEE, JJ.] Income Tax Act, 1961 : Sections 37 and 48. Income T~Assessee-Private Limited Company-Assessment years 1972-73, 1973-74, 1974-75-Loans taken from the Bank for purchase of machine1y-Machinery not utilised in business-Interest paid on loan-Claim for deduction for interest-Held, Even though the machinery has not been actually used in the business at the time when the assessment was made, the same had been treated as business asset and it was purchased° only for the purposes of the business-In the circumstances, the interest paid on the amount borrowed for purchase of such machinery is certainly a deductible amount. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 3428 of 1991. From the Judgment and Order dated 7.1.81 and 18.12.80 of the E Kerala High Court in O.P. Nos. 3222/79A and 2808 of 1978A. S. Rajappa for B.K. Prnsad for the Appellant. Anil Kumar Jha, (NP) for the Respondent. The following Order of the Court was delivered : The respondent-assessee is a private limited company. The original assessment for the years 1972-73 was made on 28.2.1973 determining the loss as Rs. 78,823. A sum of Rs. 78,500 claimed as interest paid by the assessee on amounts borrowed for purchase of machinery was allowed as G a deduction. Similarly, for the year 1973-74, in the original assessment deduction was allowed for similar interest paid by the assessee. While making the assessment for the assessment year 1974-75, the Income Tax Officer noticed that the assessee had included a note in the schedule of fixed assets appended to its balance sheet as on 31.3. 1973 and that no H SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1999] 1 S.C.R. 376 A depreciation had been made for unused rubberised machinery valued at Rs. 4,80,000. Hence, the Income Tax Officer held that such machinery had not been used for the business of the assessee. Consequently, the I.T.O. took the view that the assessee was not entitled to claim deduction for the interest paid by him in all the three assessment years. The assessment was B re-opened and fresh assessment orders were passed by the l.T.O. rejecting the claim of deduction made by the assessee. That order was confirmed on appeal by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and when the matter was taken to the Tribunal, the latter took the view that the machinery being business asset, the interest paid on the amount borrowed for the purchase of such machinery would certainly be an allowable deduction. Consequent-C ly, the Tribunal upheld the claim of the assessee and permitted the deduc-tion being made. 2. The Revenue applied to the High Court under Section 256(2) for directing the Tribunal to make a reference to it on the following question: D "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal is justified in law in holding that the interest paid by the · assessee on loans taken from the bank for the purchase of machinery, which was never used in the assessee's business, is an E allowable deduction in computing the total income of the assessee for the assessment year 1972-73 and 1973-74." Similar application was filed for the year 1974-75. The High Court dismissed the applications by two separate orders. Both the orders are challenged in this appeal. F 3. We do not find any merit in this appeal. We find that the reasoning of the Tribunal is correct. Even though the machinery has not been actually used in the business at the time when the assessment was made, the same had been treated as business asset and it was purchased only for the G purposes of the business. In the circumstances, the interest paid on the amount borrowed for purchases of such machinery is certainly a deductible amount: Consequently, the view taken by the Tribunal is correct. only is correct. Appeal dismissed. [c] 4. The appeal is dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. T.N.A. 7°"7f2000] 2 aH Rem a2-:a.gensaTWS Var saGhT (Ht ) fees3,oo8 gaa, 1999:ee SEY HPT, 1961 — UN 37 ate 48 — BI — HRAHehors BH fey aT S wre S fareTNT HS WRVe tiga ear, ALTA S Hay safer BA BS Gry geldWray wa si rege aad a merell-Praia ot yep ingte ferities aint 8 8 ervare ob meter & fey ae wwe omeSe fe sere ott ag Ua wR ars Hr icra fat am Fait 4 ako asi 1972-73, 1973-74, sik4974-75:faa, Sas Eno Wad ee Gt UR at selwer ara feral ara aOR A Te Ha Aer,Ra at UR aA ak ferg fee ay areal or APSR fra! sitar fey UM ue Were anges, ani| Ye sne a BS at sad fava ater& aH orga at AY aniter 4 siftrat 3 aa ae fraBTS wel fog oy ara Vi aiftrareer 3 Pai& are at HGR fore Ter Ere anitet fog crreerey sree ret Fete Ta en, oa Prater flee wen er TeNAy SA GRR RT WAST Ta S se aeURIdad Set Pas WTS Held Ara UAT 8) cRoreted afeaeT ERI set feat WAT AT Tel anit (Rafe) srarter=1999 at Rifeer oniter w 3428,:syoo.titur B ogee 16s ota ialsoaata AskaAddrAaa st we TT|: wearer 3 Pret.omer one eres) |gee ReiR, yor mete faite aot 81 ad 1972-733fer Ae Prete, aes 28.2.1973A fet;TAT Ot TEN H 78,823- SY SaST TS. eH ATASH soa S fory See oft WE UAT Ge Prenat SRI |sear sara Pia ofr [2001] 2 we Pee earBF WoT H grat at ag Be 78,500/- BH UAVerer at TE eh, GH ahh B Ferg Hapaag oft eetRifat 1973-74 & fag Ae Peake F Pathe ara vere at ag gel wee at anor & fing Hele to-wt as etl as 1974-75 Faker ae & fore Pak med Vag, STAGE SGN,AE ardent aot fee: FreatRett>FST Ta Gehet ee) B vers Pad snkeal wt arpaH ate 31-3-1973 Gr Yer fourm fee ar aie% 4,80,000/- Fouiar Ht Ay MgeT WRRIS AAT H fry HE sraereoy (AST A Frese). set fleet rar» - aM Salers array aioe 4 ae ahaa fear fos was AWPeaRey a fey Heyer etaa mg etl GRorerers cree sifted 3 ye Aa aed fren fos Peiwet at Freaker qef a feyBUS EI Pars Bl AWE VATS St UT at Hele or erat Hefry swear sel i Faker ya: Gen WayST ait array aftent 4 Paik eer foray HehS ad at arg aw et ag Rak aes akaFerg hi ater igel fry GT WR Bech SET Stet A ae Se at OFS at et se Tre ATE STSo SA STAT A Sere SHAN. Ae AT rere Fase fos RAa STRATE SMART EY SH SoreOT Ve eHwa & fry SEI off TE WT Ie Wars at ag are Pikad wo a Heli fog art arey 81 GRonpETET - 2, TR4 Ses RTE Hr aaer GH Gad was Aeaeitad wer + ide Fy Pee at Ss fargIRI 256(2) @ sells ade fora -—-,oo RETTTS Scat site OARA crftrarer fAah eS a ae a PaiRe at F Geers|fas metre ot Metheht @ ara y at wget wat at ag ef, wa sh Ae dar B re ay aa WR“faitart Ware fea wa ara, Futor ef 1972-73 ak 1973-74fay Freie a pea *get wenre car ode af 1974-75 % foreman el Sea MATEA ct eH ore BI andes BY EAGTfearet Be antic F cai area at Baile at aE|pe Hl ORAR3. 84 4 Se SA atta WAT A aNd ws yor A wary et fear wet Ta Sl ea wa ae en, Gree. wre Prakeot feverSh aera aren at en, aahor] any ws & Se Teald crear aehaR snhRyWat TH S aR Fe Saat HRI& war& fry wa at as oft st GRRaa ay Ve Aya F wea& fery sent oh 71S UA oR dara at aS eet Pifaa wa V Helet Bra we 81 gRempeaa ataERT 4 arfte ater aN ore 81 wel & sits A ate amber Ta ear ore