Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata – 2, Kolkata v. M/S. Snowtex Udyog Limited
High Court
16 Dec 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata – 2, Kolkata v. M/S. Snowtex Udyog Limited
Date of order
16 Dec 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata – 2, Kolkata v. M/S. Snowtex Udyog Limited, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Recording such submission, the appeal is dismissed on the ground oflow tax effect.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
OD-9
ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTASPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX)ORIGINAL SIDE
ITA/75/2015
IA No. GA/1/2015 (Old No. GA/1703/2015),GA/2/2015 (Old No. GA/1704/2015)
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA – 2, KOLKATAVS.M/S. SNOWTEX UDYOG LIMITED
BEFORE:The Hon'ble JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM ANDThe Hon’ble JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYADate : December 16, 2021.
[Via Video Conference]
Appearance:Mr. P.K. Bhowmik, Advocate… for the appellantMr. J.P. Khaitan, Sr. AdvocateMs. Anupa Banerjee, AdvocateMr. G.S. Gupta, Advocate… for the respondent
The Court : This appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260A of theIncome Tax Act is directed against the order passed by the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal, ‘B’ Bench, Kolkata.
We have heard Mr. P.K. Bhowmik, learned standing counsel appearingfor the appellant/revenue and Mr. J.P. Khaitan, learned senior counselappearing for the respondent/assessee.
We are satisfied with the reasons given in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition. Accordingly, delay in filing the appeal is condoned. Thepetition for condonation of delay stands allowed.
The learned standing counsel appearing for the appellant/revenue oninstruction from the department submitted that the appeal cannot bepursued by the revenue on account of low tax effect.
Recording such submission, the appeal is dismissed on the ground oflow tax effect.
Consequently, substantial questions of law which have been raised areleft open.
Connected application, if any, stands dismissed.
(T. S. SIVAGNANAM, J.)
(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.