Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-8, K...

Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-8, Kolkata v. Mr. Ramkrishna Agarwal

High Court 17 Dec 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-8, Kolkata v. Mr. Ramkrishna Agarwal
Date of order
17 Dec 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-8, Kolkata v. Mr. Ramkrishna Agarwal, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Recording such submission, the appeal is dismissed on the ground of low tax effect.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

OD-1 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Income Tax) ORIGINAL SIDE ITAT 84 of 2015 IA No.GA 1 of 2015(Old No.GA 1826 of 2015), GA 2 of 2015 (Old No. 1827 of 2015) COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA-8, KOLKATA VERSUS MR. RAMKRISHNA AGARWAL BEFORE: The Hon’ble JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM AND The Hon’ble JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA Date : 17[th] December, 2021. Appearance:Mr. Radhamohan Roy, Adv. …for the appellant. The Court : This appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act is directed against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ Bench, Kolkata. We have heard Mr. Radhamohan Roy, learned standing counsel appearing for the appellant/revenue. We are satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition. Accordingly, delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The application being IA No.GA 1 of 2015(Old No.GA 1826 of 2015) for condonation of delay stands allowed. The learned standing counsel appearing for the appellant/revenue on instructions from the department submitted that the appeal cannot be pursued by the revenue on account of low tax effect. Recording such submission, the appeal is dismissed on the ground of low tax effect. Consequently, substantial questions of law which have been raised are left open. The application being IA GA 2 of 2015 (Old No. 1827 of 2015) for stay also stands dismissed. (T. S. SIVAGNANAM, J.) (HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.) s.pal/pkd
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan