Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-Ii, Kolkata v. M/S. Portside Estate Ltd
High Court
04 Jan 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-Ii, Kolkata v. M/S. Portside Estate Ltd
Date of order
04 Jan 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-Ii, Kolkata v. M/S. Portside Estate Ltd, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Recording the said submission, the appeal stands dismissed on the ground of low tax effect.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
OD-12
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Income Tax) ORIGINAL SIDE
ITAT 191 of 2014
IA No.GA 2 of 2014 (Old No. GA 3613 of 2014)
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA-II, KOLKATA VERSUS M/S. PORTSIDE ESTATE LTD.
BEFORE:
The Hon’ble JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM
AND
The Hon’ble JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA Date : 4[th] January, 2022.
Appearance: Mr. Radhamohan Roy, Adv. …for the appellant.
The Court : This appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act is directed against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata.
We have heard Mr. Radhamohan Roy, learned standing counsel appearing for the appellant/revenue.
The learned standing counsel appearing for the appellant/revenue on instructions from the department submitted that the tax effect in this appeal is below the threshold limit stipulated in the circular issued by the CBDT.
Recording the said submission, the appeal stands dismissed on the ground of low tax effect.
Consequently, substantial questions of law which have been raised are left open.
The application being IA No. GA 2 of 2014 (Old No. GA 3613 of 2014) for stay also stands dismissed.
(T. S. SIVAGNANAM, J.)
(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
s.pal/pkd
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.