Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata- Ii...

Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata- Ii v. Messers Duncan Industries Limited

High Court 01 Mar 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata- Ii v. Messers Duncan Industries Limited
Date of order
01 Mar 2023
Assessment year(s)
2000-01
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata- Ii v. Messers Duncan Industries Limited, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Issue: The appeal was admitted on 28[th] February, 2011 on the followingsubstantial question of law : “1) Whether the learned tribunal below committed substantial error of lawin deleting disallowance of payment of Rs.1,20,000/- to M/s.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal stands disposed of on the ground of low tax effectand the substantial question of law is left open.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

OD-12 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTASPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX)ORIGINAL SIDE ITAT/90/2011 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA- IIVS.MESSERS DUNCAN INDUSTRIES LIMITED BEFORE :THE HON’BLE JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM AndTHE HON’BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYADate : 1[st] March, 2023 Appearance :Mr. Tilak Mitra, Adv.….for appellant. Mr. A.K. Dey, Adv.… for respondent. The Court : This appeal by the revenue filed under Section 260A of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) is directed against the common order dated 3[rd]October, 2008, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ Bench, Kolkata(Tribunal) in ITA No. 690/Kol/2008 for the assessment year 2000-01. The appeal was admitted on 28[th] February, 2011 on the followingsubstantial question of law : “1) Whether the learned tribunal below committed substantial error of lawin deleting disallowance of payment of Rs.1,20,000/- to M/s. DialConsultancy Limited by relying upon the order of assessment relatingto previous order by overlooking the fact that such fact cannot beresjudicata in the substantial year ?”in deleting disallowance of payment of Rs.1,20,000/- to M/s. DialConsultancy Limited by relying upon the order of assessment relatingto previous order by overlooking the fact that such fact cannot beresjudicata in the substantial year ?” We have heard Mr. Tilak Mitra, learned standing counsel appearing for theappellant and Mr. A.K. Dey, learned advocate for the respondent. As could be seen from the above substantial question of law, the tax effectinvolved in this case is only Rs.1,20,000/-, which is far less than the thresholdlimit of Rs.1 Crore. Therefore, the revenue cannot pursue this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal stands disposed of on the ground of low tax effectand the substantial question of law is left open. (T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.) (HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.) S.Pal/SN.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan