Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-Ii v...

Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-Ii v. M/S. Hilltop Holdings (I) Ltd

High Court 28 Jul 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-Ii v. M/S. Hilltop Holdings (I) Ltd
Date of order
28 Jul 2025
Assessment year(s)
2005-06, 2004-05
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-Ii v. M/S. Hilltop Holdings (I) Ltd, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

OD-2 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE ITA/134/2010 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA-II VS M/S. HILLTOP HOLDINGS (I) LTD. BEFORE : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S SIVAGNANAM -A N D- HON'BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS) DATE : 28th July, 2025. Appearance :Mr. Aryak Dutt, Adv. Mr. Prithu Dudhoria, Adv. …for appellant. Mr. Pratyush Jhunjhunwala, Adv. Mr. A. K. Dey, Adv….for respondent. The Court :- Since the Department is unable to trace out the records of the appeal, Mr. A. K. Dey, learned Advocate for the respondent/assessee hands over one set of the stay petition which is taken on record. This appeal has been filed by the appellant/revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) challenging the order dated 31[st] August, 2009 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” Bench, Kolkata, in ITA No.1248/Kol/2008 for the assessment year 2005-06 and ITA No.1190/Kol/2008 for the assessment year 2004-05. The learned Advocate appearing for the respondent/assessee submitted that the assessee has availed the benefit of the Direct Tax Vidaad Se Vishwas Scheme and appropriate Forms, more particularly Form 5, have been issued in favour of the respondent/assessee. In the light of the same, the appeal stands disposed of on the ground that the respondent/assessee has availed the benefit of the Scheme and the substantial questions of law raised by the revenue are left open. . (T.S. SIVAGNANAM, CJ) (CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS), J.) SM/pkd
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan