Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-Iii, Kolkata v. Indian Aluminium Co. Ltd
High Court
22 Feb 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-Iii, Kolkata v. Indian Aluminium Co. Ltd
Date of order
22 Feb 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-Iii, Kolkata v. Indian Aluminium Co. Ltd, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
OD – 21
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTASPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX)ORIGINAL SIDE
ITA/133/2006
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA-III, KOLKATAVS.INDIAN ALUMINIUM CO. LTD.
BEFORE :
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAMA N DTHE HON’BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA
Date : February 22, 2022.
[Via Video Conference]
Appearance :Mr. P K Bhowmick, Advocate… for the appellantMr. Avra Mazumder, Advocate..for respondent
The Court :Heard Mr. P.K. Bhowmick, learned standingCounsel appearing for the appellant and Mr. Avra Mazumder, learnedAdvocate for the respondent.
It appears that the appeal has already been disposed of byjudgment dated 8[th] January, 2016 of the Hon’ble Division Benchcomprising of Girish Chandra Gupta and Asha Arora, JJ. (as TheirLordships then were). In spite of the same the appeal is shown to bepending in the docket of this Court. We note with regret that in spiteof the order dated 26.09.2019 directing the department to delete theappeal from the pending list the department has ignored the order.
Therefore, as a last chance we direct Registry to ensure that thisappeal should not be shown as pending in the docket of this Courtand such direction shall be scrupulously followed not only in this caseand also in other cases where identical orders are passed.
(T. S. SIVAGNANAM, J.)
(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
RS/GH
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.