Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-Iii v. M/S. Abp Private Limited
High Court
04 Jan 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-Iii v. M/S. Abp Private Limited
Date of order
04 Jan 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-Iii v. M/S. Abp Private Limited, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Recording the said submission, the appeal stands dismissed on the ground of low tax effect.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
OD-5
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Income Tax) ORIGINAL SIDE
ITA 327 of 2009 IA No.GA 1 of 2009 (Old No. GA 2942 of 2009)
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA-III VERSUS M/S. ABP PRIVATE LIMITED
BEFORE:
The Hon’ble JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM
AND
The Hon’ble JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA Date : 4[th] January, 2022.
Appearance: Mr. P.K. Bhowmik, Adv. …for the appellant.
Mr. Agnibesh Sengupta, Adv. ...for the respondent.
The Court : This appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act is directed against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata.
We have heard Mr. P.K. Bhowmik, learned standing counsel appearing for the appellant/revenue and Mr. Agnibesh Sengupta, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
We are satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition. Accordingly, delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The application being IA No.GA 1 of 2009(Old No.GA 2942 of 2009) for condonation of delay stands allowed.
The learned standing counsel appearing for the appellant/revenue on instructions from the department submitted that the tax effect in this appeal is below the threshold limit stipulated in the circular issued by the CBDT.
Recording the said submission, the appeal stands dismissed on the ground of low tax effect.
Consequently, substantial questions of law which have been raised are left open.
(T. S. SIVAGNANAM, J.)
(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
s.pal/pkd
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.