Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-Xi v...

Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-Xi v. M/S. Simplex Somdatt Builders, Jv

High Court 06 Jun 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-Xi v. M/S. Simplex Somdatt Builders, Jv
Date of order
06 Jun 2022
Assessment year(s)
2007-08
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-Xi v. M/S. Simplex Somdatt Builders, Jv, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed on the ground of low tax effect.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX) ORIGINAL SIDE ITAT/198/2013 IA NO: GA/1/2013 (OLD NO. GA/3526/2013) COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA-XI Vs M/S. SIMPLEX SOMDATT BUILDERS, JV BEFORE : THE HON’BLE JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM And THE HON’BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA Date : 6[th] June, 2022. Appearance: Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, Adv. ....for appellant Ms. Nilanjana Banerjee Pal, Adv. ...for the respondent. The Court : This appeal by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act, for brevity) is directed against the order dated June 18, 2013, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” Bench, Kolkata in I.T.A. No. 1684/Kol/2011 and in I.T.A. No. 1685/Kol/2011 for the assessment year 2007-08. We have heard Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, learned standing counsel appearing for the appellant/revenue and Ms. Nilanjana Banerjee Pal, learned counsel appearing for the respondent/assessee. As rightly pointed out by the learned standing counsel appearing for the appellant/revenue that the tax effect in the case on hand is Rs.31,31,684/- which is below the threshold limited fixed by the CBDT in its circular. Therefore, the revenue cannot pursue this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed on the ground of low tax effect. The stay application also stands closed. Consequently, the substantial questions of law suggested are left open. (T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.) (HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.) S.pal/GH
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan