Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-Xii...

Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-Xii v. Messers Durga Trading Company

High Court 04 Jan 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-Xii v. Messers Durga Trading Company
Date of order
04 Jan 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-Xii v. Messers Durga Trading Company, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Recording the said submission, the appeal stands dismissed on the ground of low tax effect.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

OD-4 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Income Tax) ORIGINAL SIDE ITA 315 of 2009 IA No.GA 1 of 2009 (Old No. GA 2905 of 2009) COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA-XII VERSUS MESSERS DURGA TRADING COMPANY BEFORE: The Hon’ble JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM AND The Hon’ble JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA Date : 4[th] January, 2022. Appearance: Ms. Suchismita Biswas, Adv. Mr. Madhu Jana, Adv. …for the appellant. Mr. Subash Agarwal, Adv. ...for the respondent. The Court : This appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act is directed against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata. We have heard Ms. Suchismita Biswas, learned standing counsel appearing for the appellant/revenue and Mr. Subash Agarwal, learned counsel appearing for the respondent. We are satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition. Accordingly, delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The application being IA No.GA 1 of 2009(Old No.GA 2905 of 2009) for condonation of delay stands allowed. The learned standing counsel appearing for the appellant/revenue on instructions from the department submitted that the tax effect in this appeal is below the threshold limit stipulated in the circular issued by the CBDT. Recording the said submission, the appeal stands dismissed on the ground of low tax effect. Consequently, substantial questions of law which have been raised are left open. (T. S. SIVAGNANAM, J.) (HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.) s.pal/pkd
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan