Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-Xiv v. Ritesh Kumar Boyed
High Court
12 Dec 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-Xiv v. Ritesh Kumar Boyed
Date of order
12 Dec 2023
Assessment year(s)
2007-08
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-Xiv v. Ritesh Kumar Boyed, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
ORDER
OD – 14
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTASPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX)ORIGINAL SIDE
ITA/18/2014
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA-XIVVERSUSRITESH KUMAR BOYED
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble Justice SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI
The Hon'ble Justice RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ
Date : 12[th] December 2023.
Appearance:
Mr. Smarajit Roychowdhury, Advocate… for appellant.
Mr. Subash Agarwal, AdvocateMr. Brijesh Kr. Singh, AdvocateMr. Nitish Bhandary, Advocate… for respondent.
1.This appeal relates to assessment year 2007-08.
2.Learned counsel for the Income Tax Department / appellant states that inthis case, the tax effect involved is less than the monetary limit for filingappeal as prescribed in Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 andtherefore this appeal may be dismissed.this case, the tax effect involved is less than the monetary limit for filingappeal as prescribed in Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 andtherefore this appeal may be dismissed.
3.In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is dismissed.
(SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, J.)
(RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue