Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-Xvii v. Deo Kumar Saraf
High Court
17 Jan 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-Xvii v. Deo Kumar Saraf
Date of order
17 Jan 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-Xvii v. Deo Kumar Saraf, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Recording the said submission, the appeal stands dismissed on the ground of low tax effect.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
OD-5
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Income Tax) ORIGINAL SIDE
ITA 57 of 2011 IA No. GA 1 of 2010 (Old No. GA 3531 of 2010)
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA-XVII VERSUS DEO KUMAR SARAF
BEFORE:
The Hon’ble JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM
AND The Hon’ble JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA Date : 17[th] January, 2022.
Appearance: Mr. Arunava Ganguly, Adv. …for the appellant Mr. Malay Dhar, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Sengupta, Adv. ...for the respondent.
The Court : This appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act is directed against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata.
The learned standing counsel appearing for the appellant/revenue has given instructions to the effect that this appeal cannot be prosecuted by the appellant/revenue on the ground of low tax effect.
Recording the said submission, the appeal stands dismissed on the ground of low tax effect.
Consequently, substantial questions of law which have been raised are left open.
The application being IA No. GA 1 of 2010 (Old No. GA 3531 of 2010) for stay also stands dismissed.
(T. S. SIVAGNANAM, J.)
(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.