Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-Xvii v. Ms. Maya Sarkar
High Court
13 Dec 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-Xvii v. Ms. Maya Sarkar
Date of order
13 Dec 2021
Assessment year(s)
2007-08
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-Xvii v. Ms. Maya Sarkar, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the light of the said submission, this appeal is dismissed on theground of low tax effect.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTASpecial Jurisdiction (Income Tax)ORIGINAL SIDE
IA No.GA/1/2014(Old No. GA/3766/2014)
InITAT/192/2014
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA-XVIIVsMS. MAYA SARKAR
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM AND
The Hon’ble JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA
Date : December 13, 2021.(Via Video Conference)
Appearance:Ms. Sucharita Biswas, Adv.… for the appellant/Revenue
Mr. Malay Dhar, Adv.Mr. Bhaskar Sengupta, Adv.… for the respondent/assessee
The Court : This appeal by the Revenue filed under Section 260A of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 (the ‘Act’ in brevity) is directed against the order dated8[th] July, 2014 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ Bench,Kolkata in ITA No. 622/Kol/2012 for the assessment year 2007-08.
We have heard Ms. Sucharita Biswas, learned standing counselappearing for the appellant/Revenue and Mr. Malay Dhar, learned counselappearing for the respondent/assessee.
It is pointed out by the learned standing counsel for the appellant byreferring to the assessment order that tax effect in this case is well below thethreshold limit fixed in the circular issued by the C.B.D.T.
In the light of the said submission, this appeal is dismissed on theground of low tax effect. The substantial questions of law raised by theRevenue are left open.
Consequently, application also stands dismissed.
(T. S. SIVAGNANAM, J.)
(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
RS/GH.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.