In Commissioner Of Income Tax Kot v. M/S Manglam Cement Ltd, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: 2.This Court while admitting the matter framed followingquestion of law:- “Whether the findings of the Tribunal areperverse in confirming the order of the CIT(A)by allowing interest of Rs.
Decision: 4.Hence, the appeal stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH ATJAIPUR
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 104 / 2008
Commissioner Of Income Tax Kot
----Appellant
Versus
M/S Manglam Cement Ltd
----Respondent
_____________________________________________________
For Appellant(s) : Ms. Parinitoo JainFor Respondent(s) : Mr. Sanjay Jhanwar
_____________________________________________________
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. JHAVERI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHURJudgment / Order
27/01/2017
1.By way of this appeal, the appellant has challenged thejudgment & order of the Tribunal whereby the Tribunal has partlyallowed the appeal preferred by the department.
2.This Court while admitting the matter framed followingquestion of law:-
“Whether the findings of the Tribunal areperverse in confirming the order of the CIT(A)by allowing interest of Rs. 4,64,99,798/- asrevenue expenditure, specifically when theinterest was paid on borrowed capital to set up anew unit and also capitalized in the books ofaccounts?”
3.Counsel for the appellant contended that the controversy inrespect of the same assessee has already been decided by thisCourt on 4[th] October, 2016 in D.B Income Tax Appeal No.
80/2002 where identical question was framed and the issue was
decided in favour of the assessee and against the department.
4.Hence, the appeal stands dismissed.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR)J.
(K.S. JHAVERI)J.
A.Sharma/91
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.