Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax Kot v. M/S Ma...

Commissioner Of Income Tax Kot v. M/S Manglam Cement Ltd

High Court 27 Jan 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax Kot v. M/S Manglam Cement Ltd
Date of order
27 Jan 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax Kot v. M/S Manglam Cement Ltd, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: 2.This Court while admitting the matter framed followingquestion of law:- “Whether the findings of the Tribunal areperverse in confirming the order of the CIT(A)by allowing interest of Rs.

Decision: 4.Hence, the appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH ATJAIPUR D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 104 / 2008 Commissioner Of Income Tax Kot ----Appellant Versus M/S Manglam Cement Ltd ----Respondent _____________________________________________________ For Appellant(s) : Ms. Parinitoo JainFor Respondent(s) : Mr. Sanjay Jhanwar _____________________________________________________ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. JHAVERI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHURJudgment / Order 27/01/2017 1.By way of this appeal, the appellant has challenged thejudgment & order of the Tribunal whereby the Tribunal has partlyallowed the appeal preferred by the department. 2.This Court while admitting the matter framed followingquestion of law:- “Whether the findings of the Tribunal areperverse in confirming the order of the CIT(A)by allowing interest of Rs. 4,64,99,798/- asrevenue expenditure, specifically when theinterest was paid on borrowed capital to set up anew unit and also capitalized in the books ofaccounts?” 3.Counsel for the appellant contended that the controversy inrespect of the same assessee has already been decided by thisCourt on 4[th] October, 2016 in D.B Income Tax Appeal No. 80/2002 where identical question was framed and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee and against the department. 4.Hence, the appeal stands dismissed. (VINIT KUMAR MATHUR)J. (K.S. JHAVERI)J. A.Sharma/91
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan