Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kota v. Kris...

Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kota v. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Bhawani Mandi

High Court 18 Jan 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kota v. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Bhawani Mandi
Date of order
18 Jan 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kota v. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Bhawani Mandi, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: 2.The Court while admitting the appeal on 18.11.2008, hasframed the following substantial question of law: “(i)Whether under the facts andcircumstances of the case, the Tribunal isjustified in holding that the appeals of therevenue have become infructuous since theassessee Samiti has been allowedreg...

Decision: 5.The appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH ATJAIPUR D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 497 / 2008 Commissioner of Income Tax, Kota. ----Appellant Versus Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Bhawani Mandi. ----Respondent _____________________________________________________ For Appellant(s) :Mrs. Parinitoo Jain. _____________________________________________________ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. JHAVERI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHURJudgment Per Hon’ble Jhaveri J. 18/01/2017 1. By way of this appeal, the appellant has challenged thejudgment and order of the Tribunal whereby the Tribunal hasallowed both the appeals for the statistical purposes. 2.The Court while admitting the appeal on 18.11.2008, hasframed the following substantial question of law: “(i)Whether under the facts andcircumstances of the case, the Tribunal isjustified in holding that the appeals of therevenue have become infructuous since theassessee Samiti has been allowedregistration u/s. 12A of the Act whereasthe issue before the Tribunal was thatwhether the assessee Samiti falls underthe four corners of the Explanation toSection 10(20) of the Act?” 3.However, the issue is covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Krishi UpajMandi Samiti, Shrimadhopur (2011) 331 ITR 174 (Raj.). 4.Therefore, in this view of the matter, the issue is decided in favour of the assessee and against the department. 5.The appeal stands dismissed. (VINIT KUMAR MATHUR)J. (K.S. JHAVERI)J. Asheesh Kr. Yadav/111
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan