In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kota v. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Bhawani Mandi, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: 2.The Court while admitting the appeal on 18.11.2008, hasframed the following substantial question of law: “(i)Whether under the facts andcircumstances of the case, the Tribunal isjustified in holding that the appeals of therevenue have become infructuous since theassessee Samiti has been allowedreg...
Decision: 5.The appeal stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH ATJAIPUR
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 497 / 2008
Commissioner of Income Tax, Kota.
----Appellant
Versus
Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Bhawani Mandi.
----Respondent
_____________________________________________________
For Appellant(s) :Mrs. Parinitoo Jain.
_____________________________________________________
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. JHAVERI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHURJudgment
Per Hon’ble Jhaveri J.
18/01/2017
1. By way of this appeal, the appellant has challenged thejudgment and order of the Tribunal whereby the Tribunal hasallowed both the appeals for the statistical purposes.
2.The Court while admitting the appeal on 18.11.2008, hasframed the following substantial question of law:
“(i)Whether under the facts andcircumstances of the case, the Tribunal isjustified in holding that the appeals of therevenue have become infructuous since theassessee Samiti has been allowedregistration u/s. 12A of the Act whereasthe issue before the Tribunal was thatwhether the assessee Samiti falls underthe four corners of the Explanation toSection 10(20) of the Act?”
3.However, the issue is covered by the decision of this Court in
the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Krishi UpajMandi Samiti, Shrimadhopur (2011) 331 ITR 174 (Raj.).
4.Therefore, in this view of the matter, the issue is decided in
favour of the assessee and against the department.
5.The appeal stands dismissed.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR)J. (K.S. JHAVERI)J.
Asheesh Kr. Yadav/111
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.