In Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ltu v. Tata Motors Ltd, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
DDR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 886 OF 2018IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1751 OF 2018
Commissioner of Income Tax-LTU..Applicant(org.Appellant)
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Commissioner of Income Tax-LTU..Appellantvs.Tata Motors Ltd...Respondent
….........
Mr. Suresh Kumar for applicant/org. Appellant.Mr. Srihari Iyer for respondent.
….........
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI &
M.S. KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : 4[th] JANUARY, 2019
P.C.:
This Notice of Motion is for condonation of delay of2 days in filing the present Appeal.
2.For the reasons mentioned in the Affidavit-in-
support, delay deserves to be condoned. The Notice of Motion is
made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
3.Notice of Motion is disposed of.
(M.S. KARNIK, J.) (AKIL KURESHI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue