Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ludhiana v. Amrik Singh
High Court
29 Apr 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ludhiana v. Amrik Singh
Date of order
29 Apr 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ludhiana v. Amrik Singh, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: We have, by separate order andjudgment, dismissed that appeal. | For the reasons stated therein, this appeal is also dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ITA No.38 of 2014 (O&M)Date of decision:2904.2015
Commissioner of Income Tax, Ludhiana|
Versus
....Appellant
Amrik Singh, Proprietor M/s Nexo Products (India), Ludhiana
...... Responden
CORAM:HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.J.VAZIFDAR, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA
Present:Mr.Rajesh Katoch, Advocate, for the appellant,
Mr.Rajiv Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
0000
S.J.Vazifdar, Acting Chief Justice(Oral):
The questions of law raised in this appeal are similar to the first two
questions of law raised in ITA No.347 of 2013. We have, by separate order andjudgment, dismissed that appeal. |
For the reasons stated therein, this appeal is also dismissed.
(S.J.Vazifdar)
Acting Chief Justice
29.04.20154(*8241
(G.S.Sandhawalia)
Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue