Commissioner Of Income Tax, Muzaffarpur & Ors v. Sardar Virendra Singh
High Court
10 Jul 2012 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Muzaffarpur & Ors v. Sardar Virendra Singh
Date of order
10 Jul 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Muzaffarpur & Ors v. Sardar Virendra Singh, the High Court (2012) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4304 of 2011
======================================================
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Muzaffarpur & Ors .... .... Petitioner/s Versus Sardar Virendra Singh .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Archana Sinha @ Archana S For the Respondent/s : Mr.
.... .... Petitioner/s .... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHand HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAINORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH)3. 10-07-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
It appears that at pre-notice stage a peremptory order passed on 28 January, 2011 could not be complied with within time. However, it was subsequently complied, learned counsel for the petitioner has explain the default by pointing out the averments which show that the earlier counsel did not hand over the file to the department and hence the record had to be re-constructed.
In the facts of the case, the prayer for restoration is allowed and M.A. No. 637 of 2008 is restored to its original file.
(Shiva Kirti Singh, J)
Fahad./-
(Vikash Jain,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.