Commissioner Of Income Tax-Muzaffarpur v. Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Motihari
High Court
23 Sep 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-Muzaffarpur v. Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Motihari
Date of order
23 Sep 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax-Muzaffarpur v. Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Motihari, the High Court (2014) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
5 20-10-2014
A.I./- U
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1355 of 2013
In
MA 457 of 2006
====================================================== Commissioner of Income Tax-Muzaffarpur
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Motihari
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :For the Petitioner/s : Smt. Archana Sinha @ Archana Shahi
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI
and
HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA
ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI)
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Considering the fact that in paragraph 4 of the order, dated 23.09.2014, the expression, “M.A.No. 457 of 2013” ought to have been recorded as “M.A.No. 457 of 2006”, it is hereby, in the interest of justice, directed that the expression, “M.A.457 of 2013”, appearing in paragraph 4 of the order, dated 23.09.2014, , shall stand corrected, and be henceforth read, as “M.A. No. 457 of 2006”.
(I. A. Ansari, J)
(Anjana Mishra, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue