Commissioner Of Income Tax, Muzaffarpur v. Ganesh Foundry & Casting Ltd., Muzaffarpur
High Court
15 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Muzaffarpur v. Ganesh Foundry & Casting Ltd., Muzaffarpur
Date of order
15 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Muzaffarpur v. Ganesh Foundry & Casting Ltd., Muzaffarpur, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the aforesaid circumstances, the appeal filed by the Department is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Appeal No.231 of 2007
======================================================
Commissioner of Income Tax, Muzaffarpur
.... .... Appellant
Versus
Ganesh Foundry & Casting Ltd., Muzaffarpur
.... .... Respondent
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mrs. Archana Sinha, Sr.S.C., Income Tax For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Rastogi, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGHORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA)
8 15-01-2016
It is submitted by learned counsel for the respondent that the tax effect in the present matter is to the extent of Rs.8,77,335/- only after including surcharge and excluding interest.
In the memo of appeal the suit value and appeal value has been shown at Rs.19,07,250/-, which, according to learned counsel for the respondent, has been wrongly calculated. Yet even after the said calculation the said amount is below the mandatory limit fixed for filing and pursuing of appeals before the High Court at Rs.20 lacs by Circular No. 21 of 2015 dated 10.12.2015 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes in which it is clearly provided that the instruction will apply retrospectively to pending appeals also and such appeals below the tax limits prescribed may
spal/-
U
be withdrawn/not pressed. It is also stated in paragraph-4 of the said Circular that the tax will not include any interest thereon except where chargeability of interest itself is in dispute, which is not so in the present matter.
In the aforesaid circumstances, the appeal filed by the Department is dismissed.
(Ramesh Kumar Datta, J)
(Sudhir Singh, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.