Commissioner Of Income Tax, Muzaffarpur v. M/S Chandan Talkies, Samastipur
High Court
23 Jan 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Muzaffarpur v. M/S Chandan Talkies, Samastipur
Date of order
23 Jan 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Muzaffarpur v. M/S Chandan Talkies, Samastipur, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the aforesaid circumstances, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Appeal No.235 of 2007
======================================================
Commissioner of Income Tax, Muzaffarpur
.... .... Appellant
Versus
M/s Chandan Talkies, Samastipur
.... .... Respondent
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant : Mrs. Archana Sinha, Sr. S.C. Mr. Suman Kr. Mishra, Jr. S.C. For the Respondent : None
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA
And
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA)
6
23-01-2015
Heard learned counsel for the appellant-Income Tax
Department.
Admittedly, the tax effect in the present matter is to the extent of Rs.1,27,869/- only whereas as per the circular issued by the C.B.D.T as prevalent at the relevant time, the tax effect for filing an appeal before the High Court ought not to be less than Rs.4,00,000/-. Further no substantial question of law of recurring
nature arises in the present matter.
In the aforesaid circumstances, the appeal is
dismissed.
B.T/-
U
(Ramesh Kumar Datta, J)
(Vikash Jain, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.