Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax, Muzaffarpur...

Commissioner Of Income Tax, Muzaffarpur v. M/S Pragati Enterprises,Old Post Office, Road

High Court 03 Aug 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Muzaffarpur v. M/S Pragati Enterprises,Old Post Office, Road
Date of order
03 Aug 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Muzaffarpur v. M/S Pragati Enterprises,Old Post Office, Road, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In that view of the matter, this appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Appeal No.35 of 2006 ====================================================== Commissioner Of Income Tax, Muzaffarpur..... Appellant Versus M/S Pragati Enterprises,Old Post Office, Road, Samastipur............................................................Respondent ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Harshwardhan Pd.Advocate Mrs. Archana Sharma,Advocate. For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH) 6 03-08-2012 Learned counsel for the Revenue fairly submits that the tax effect involved in this appeal is very meager and much below the permissible limit of Rs.4,00000/- ( four lakhs ) for preferring such appeal by the Department. In that view of the matter, this appeal is dismissed. (Shiva Kirti Singh, J) (Vikash Jain, J) Naresh/-
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan