Case Law › Supreme Court › [1996] 1 S.C.R. 197

Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Orissa v. M/S. Kalinga Tubes Ltd

Supreme Court [1996] 1 S.C.R. 197 08 Jan 1996 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
Supreme Court
Parties
Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Orissa v. M/S. Kalinga Tubes Ltd
Date of order
08 Jan 1996
Assessment year(s)
1962-63, 1971-72
Outcome
Allowed

Case analysis

⚙️ Auto-generated structured summary from the order — a quick research aid, not a hand-reviewed analysis. Read the original judgment below for authority.
In Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Orissa v. M/S. Kalinga Tubes Ltd, the Supreme Court (1996) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Legal topics
Business expenditureTransfer pricing

Sections referenced in this judgment

Original judgment (source document)

The analysis above is EaseValue's editorial summary. Below is the court's original order, reproduced from the public record as a source document — the OCR text is cleaned for readability but may retain scanning artifacts; rely on the official source for the authentic version.
▸ Show the full original order (source text)
9)hd)Wt D9 FF ih d 19961) 9,onTh) Moret] 5)mise (Lp osT brews Sle 51m. B.P. Souesr O)pr_ig LOM M LOTeTLLls halwTET Hy)9S.B. wsn(ip 2Heniulluied GLioev(ipemmus(h) c CU(MLDITEST OUT] Dpenovo TSI I HSl/or. HOIST to UpLiew LADW alm Liomesr oul) FL_t_wp, allmucmer ot) - uMCunMnysgeMwour - ents HBomrrsbAlWoevd (PeOFayI55 Corortholwetle - sumMounMyastiwour ailmucmer ClFwsTOF YIHH Cousvor(h)Lo - cued ou (LOTest out] €L_t_w, 1961: Ul (PHOHW Dpoo>»rig sd olMucmoxr outl Fy5HH Corovsrig Woutle 1903 sSortsSi_) Sogn, SStLtryemr_wgs - UlbemoSU DposrigHYIUVITOO HoTHAL LIL L out! - PHhenoHuU Bpovo>#»riged oull GaHONASULILLA- 1971 – 72 OVS Ba LDf, VO6)5TL_TLJom- aAnCunyéaAsMwor 1971 - 2 sora&eh) Qoogv. sila; Car (pur e160] UJMIHHL THITWOOISTIOT BIMIuerLorarh] sto GLprwsr Huss allMLeMMIMI. BHO Mius#»¢ss| Ma WHS WwW allMucemosr outle Fr_t_w, 19O9OeSLL Covessrigu Ourmiliyy 2 ers. Cwomuy Hlyniucrsdioor 196HON SHS 31.03.1990 allmucmer outl Soyiouvrre Hsoorsd(h) ClFAsV Mmhsuo outlurs eh.11,02,09d/- Cease Couch) crorm OlFrevQ)ToxorTl_irod Cwed (Ppoomuliyvd ATUIUTWLTETs! Cwmuty eh.(H-2,21,101/- 9S GFOMHSSHI. CLOMLG ehurwrers 19/1 — (2 HeovrsSL_(GQuTrMILIUTeTs! srasrmil, s5orred Cromug ehurws 19/0 — 71 vent OFvrailaormisonasroar HenovwviuleodD SByplss CoucoTHITWOISTTT HIMoucorL cues HovrrsA We (penMenw WileoHTL NAH (poorou oilMiienosr out! Hlpevor(hoult_t_H] oroorCarn sensenLOMISHloulL_வாி OF YIHHILIOOUTMIUILITBVT L_(hHOTA HTT HATwWreisaAS O)WoyLW strom Qigtiiomt_uiled CGCLMUig SYM Doni wW5 HHM HLL Covesrigui almMucnmor oullomu! HowrhHL_(h) Dpowr ) WILDL] CLOEv(LPemMUTL_(h) Dpomonrwitlesr 29 HATOOOU O(MHLOTalmucner Fwd Uler Sire allmucncr out! OF Qss Conevoriguid) outl ClFayisds Coucorigu GOlumMLL (pidge, GlummMrajlw, HTQoormis ydw Carlacns QMlaivicnou olmMucmer cull Qoyjoucr Frirey OOFYIGS Covorrigu CGUTMILIL] SHPowrg (HAGO crormib IB HoortedHoT nares QurMmvuTrsS O)(hbSTYIL ou(mworer ollFFr_w-owo UlMeay 3HOTS L_(h)Gpowrige HHH! Ola rere out] OFQSARIWOUT GOSMTTOMLD oQ)wiLoLiluje HPDAVTL ATTOBIAH CT Hig Licnt _wilwievd QY)wCwevipe (l)2 with wosmsdlior (pa, FSoumrords csrormio (IluMNCunmnysqj HVTAA AT IPEOMenw YosTUMMIUdsTred allMucmes#r OFWs 2 t CorD OTT SHLILI(H(iii) euTOw Mud @ilweuntOUT LCWCeUTHIGIeven 7 weu] Ow Ld GF Mw DOORHOMUUDDHSTSDOVOv(OPWouldHASNMNIUBMSrSCour 2 wt HS arHMsotlosr (por HLUGQHAOA THHD(HUHL_LILI$0 BL LILITL(Q) (hLM15S(Lp le 29 wT hdloom HTUY THF) CFWWLILL_O), OhouTW HiommullorgOFWWLILILL CLosvr(penMul(h) S sn Htoy : 1. 9 wr HdloorMsdl oor STUY Homrourags Bove. sumowumMulUMbs HowsD We (lpooMenwu WeoruMmnmMwcurg, wnmlowumMulag_MwCoremrigui alMuUcner ouMenuWL! COUuTMIdsddoumOT, oolatT a ailmumesr outl OFyszIOUSMOSIor OlumMuLy HAewo_AGO, Bona DP LULL OOM. Bibs Hlomowuilev cull OF HY5H Cousvxrigw HL omw o2 WT ADSM SOrLwW FTFOOFEOW oTIPLIUOUH! OUTHSSOMMH!). [2ZO2- 2. SMCUTMHWU MAH, (Iphonodsuw OlHtttyomr_ut 1962-63 9,109,COFYFSFIUOUTTO WNOTUMMUUMWD ania Hora (peomuler Biguiiialmucner ot! GlFayidss Couorsrigui GlUITMILIL] sTIPHHASHorignaArer WHITH) 31.3.1966 germ allmucnor otf) gdlarMured (ETOTLIF! OD OVEN. STOMOUTMTUIeyID, Mortlads HorrdsAWed BeHBT) WN oor2 HST oT LyoreyiL_CLoul] M வாி 1h] OY] 60OFYIHHIOUDMNOlumrmiuO)5IrL_iTLLod! LILDf, 1962-034,UHNCUMUIAHMWouUTLwW CFTHHSTISS Mor. QGonH otHl THA) out] ClFOCuvipenmul() Glewig! Y)\midluiledD 1962-63 wHIOLTL_@) SpooriCOFyszID Clurmtionuls Gummer csrarud) 2 omronwgstor, Oamumer out) HMIUTWHASOD Q\poortroudsy Cwvipemmult_yo eh.2HOMASLIUL LHI].QLOTVo BH) UNA HowmrTrHAS WED (pen mMuslesrut OFyYFFIUDMSroT Clurmuuleor OFTrHRuUCHOU UTHSSTH). oTHHOUT(H FUNDA AMVTSADWS Ipsonomwe loruMmMo wHlewFe-wcorort 19/1-/2 wHl1962-63 w/o) Qohaareor wHdlwW allMucmor outl Hlayjonuds OOFYIFSHIUDNG lvsgH CST (pywrs) crooTus! OCloweNuvsmt_ wirHTUUTUIHS OT (YyysR BQorrms olMucmor-otl gAdglarMure yslu CAMoaNin GarHSSUULL FTO 29 wT HSIWOTMD HouMror (Ipyoysy bss 1 od)! LL7DI, 6Fn_l_(h\ HLg LILIEMLLilia HO)FWIOUCLP Cartlsone QIMaluule OF oor OFteMsoowW CSMTVID BVVUG BSSOSW HHH Gorge GUNUIULL FTA HHH ov. [203-F-G, 204-C] 3. allmucmor ofl SYjooMlear 2 F57Oy aNMLomor of) HSTUUITWMW COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, ORISSA v. MIS. KALINGA TUBES LTD. JANUARY 8, 1996 [B.P. JEEVAN REDDY AND S.B. MAJMUDAR. JJ.] Cei1trai Sales Tax Act. 1956 : Sales Tt.v.:-Assessee-Follo\VillR 1nerca11t;/e sysfe1n of accnunting-Liability to pay tax--Held arises when the assess~e nuule the sale. Income Tax Act, 1961 : Sectio11 37. Assessee 's sale's tax liabili(v arisinR duri11s: the previous year relevant to assessment year 1962-63-Tax de!ennined by Sales Tax Officer in a subsequent year-Tax denuuul reduced by Tribunal during previous .vear relevant to a~·.\·essn1ent year 1971-72-Held assessee \Vas not entitled to clairn deduction (~fthe said an1nunt in assessn1ent .vear 1971-72. The rospondent-Company was engagt!d in the manufacture and sales of steel tubes and was liable lo pay sales lax under the Central sales Tax Act, 1956. In respect of assessment year 1962-63 the Sales Tax Officer completed the assessment on 31st March, 1996 and demand additional tax of Rs. 11,02,698. This amount was reduced to Rs. 2,21,161 by the Tribunal in second appeal. The respondent-assessee claimed deduction of the said amount as business expenditure in respect of the assessment for the previous year 1970-71 since according to it the sales-tax liability was of the assessment year 1971-72. The Income-tax Officer disallowed the said deduction in the relevant assessment year on the ground that the assessee was following mercantile system of accounting and hence the liability lo pay sales tax accrued to it prior to the said year. The appellate Commissioner allowed the said deduction holding that as the said liability became determinate and known only during that assessment year, it could he ~llowed for that assessment year. The Iucomc-Tax Tribunal reversed the finding of the Appellate Commissioner and held that the said sales tax liability was not admissible as deduction during the relevant assessment year. The High Court held that the liability to pay sales tax can be said to have initially accrued when the H 197 198 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (1996] 1 S.C.R. sales were effected but till the liability had ceased, it shall be treated to have continued to accrue and that when pursuant to the Tribunal's order a fresh demand notice was served by the Sales Tax Officer on the assessee, the liability on the assessee can be said to have accrued on receipt of such demand notice and, therefore, the assessee could claim the deduction under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act during the assessment year 1971-72 even though the liability was of the assessment year 1962-63. In appeal to this Court it was contended for the revenue that (i) the decision of the High Court was erroneous; (ii) as the assessee was following mercantile system of accounting the liability to pay the central sales tax C accrued to the respondent:assessee, the moment the sales, which were subject to sales tax, were made; and (iii) the liability could not cease to be a liability because the assessee had taken proceedings before higher authorities for getting it reduced or wiped out so long as the contention of the assessee did not prevail. Allowing the appeal preferred by Revenue and setting aside the decision of the High Court, this Court HELD : 1. The decision of the High Court is not sustainable at all. When the assessee is following mercantile system of accounting, in case of sales tax payable by the assessee, the liability to pay sales tax would accrue the moment the dealer made sales, which are subject to sales tax. At that stage the obligation to pay the tax arises. Raising of dispute in this connection before the higher authorities would be irrelevant. [202-A, 203-E] SSS ye5 APeoaa BAe STPADA) DAD) SOdANS5, S05 OM Sa) xoy S, 1956: DED SD DA— HHODAPG — Hredezs WS"OGON MWNMOVGOWGO -— DBOOP)S eres — DHoMard oxo So BSApt AD). ITIP OOD) D1961: 280 37. 1962-63 Bo% Hoi OH8 SomoHod AnKoH8 Hoss SoS > wx SoDHOMAPCA GBS) xo are DSyHehoB — SWS Hoss SoS oxy OxoOHSS TPO? DN) Vona@Mdo — WHo’ HNonsy5o0 1971-72 H HomoHovSHH Sods SoS BensSS Decor Sxn)Biv SAodsa&ko® - HAow% Sods1971-72 S? BO")xy Aveseay Sawey SAD BALPNE DHoDAPHE O SBaxr@ Sova ah) Mero SPH Hbdcin wxsren Bx MbcONS) DN) Wed, 1956 SSO HDS ANd) BOONMAE aPAss DorPowo8.1962-63 Dow DOHSHWANS NHOMOHOD WADSH DAD OHSS 1996 avd) 31Hx) oda wea BH LScto b.11,02,698 ody BX Xk BdwoE me SBBASH. BOSS GAS S Bend arco Se Sosy Sr. 2,21,161 & SAodCDSA.1970-71 S003)NONBOPNSNOAOHorwఆ DEP 0oF caDsCoreMAMFonowe®» GBsrPA- HBowmmrs DO» Wy, Dom¥oB ard GsrDd) eA 1971-72 WHY NonSONS BotMdoH. DA WMHoMM& aredassOS OMON DeoDNV WAGA, WOMAO FB NoONSOPONS ANot TWAS HD)XD SD HXXd BDOOWD)S evGys GOSS SSS st7Pchy Hx) OHSS Somo HHOY Hoss SoS” 8 SdxomoHx BIH Gorhts ABBAS. weyG SMASEGnS, dow SodhSoSS @ eres QSONAGNOHN BOHNNOWA, @& AWSOHH OPV OXdMHBosSSOD DOofa 8 DMdxBonowx oxoxeoBosds STPADS Hx Gangs wyG SASS Awd, ASchéwx B5x)80D00DEAS Gonos LH0%) HodS SOS? DH Sy OSI DX, argos MSS onoGAPHONACA DE 0H. oxoysren BOANSAP% wx Dxoy BOOMD)S arPSOMOS” AS ASHA BwdSev), Sa ares GARa SSH, OG KNarMeXDOMEIOWADDBHONA WEA Baydd AnsCOS) Wades; 90082) DAEAS asraprp &Xr0B SBx% aS Bada, weno &Xr0B SBx. woBOS DAODAPOIa BPHse3 DOAOAN BH)Owd) WA wothae, 1962-63 woSOSMOVS arSg BoOSS wonh%H 88, 1971-72 HBo® Kos oS erradyDAD) SOSA VEN 37 805 SxBOoDAPte Ahdsfawospa Posse. Se St JS wid S Bdxirs SHOS wBoNoBSA DxdSrp, (i) aXyPrabaPso Vaho Sp; (ii) HBow~arco aresaDWOVHWAJOWMA, 92035Hin S°a& exoysren BBAS SXahinod?, Sos oxo Wy Axxo BOs HBwrA-DHoMaPws soewoA, LGcbn (iii) HHoAmo weds BawvorrTP) SAO NTRPHZA SOE NS WHT SNS OHS"HO Hoot 6sSODSooos Ss Gos) as OSH Sdoo aS ergs sotdho sAgsm wdspHONQACYB. BBxory SSDS Tren DHS 2S xo wxosBive HSckw BrS°t DoSPES DXioe, S NSado: 1. arse MBS) DSaho wHyoo HSHSarP St. HHowMart wOo00S 2 aPEdeDOVGWA\NPCH, WHoDMMO BOOWHONN WAwoySH NAddHos®, wx kh Hx) BOowO™S ari BoS wxnysren BS K<DOHeHoO, BD Ox SY Bxnt Sa& sodron. @ SIS Kxd) BOOS echoe SSH MHG. Ss Acs” SXyS OHSrt%en Avot Dararny SSISKo exn[202-A, 203-E] 2. Ons HoSSoS, wBommrt Anson HonoGs Sonsy5o 1962-638SoS wx SH Sk) BOOS ery, wxoHBoDS arcBer wFo8oh DAgrsoSTPOOTP SBBOH SUP DSBSA. 8 Noss OHS SomoHhods wodsarx oxox OOS°O 31.3.1966 S° BP8 Bcdo arsisdo. wanes, arcdex, W, OL SD xo) OHSS Gero GsrKo HSxweswrdsS wx Sw dxo) asronEPO NODMohHhd MHo’ NonSTONS MHowTMPwWANS DVSjGdeo BMdoMmPt® BNA Naren BA, DSS% 1962-63 HAowy SodsyOr28 wx SBOOPD)S egy SPoddo B6ASA, BO 28.5.1970 S wx Axxo BaddSpot Boss wenewd® Ue. 2,22,161 & SAowoaS. SH OG areBaxsr DLN GEPOOTP WanySq DAI, BOOWWAS SOAY arts dwWS2 Wowdwen)woe. 1971-72 MAow® Hodis SoS? 1962-63 HBHow SoS OHS SoS oxyHx) DSran© BOY So aredaxs OF OBOA Agrard) oxVSxosy HAoMHOHMOS AP Ddstomowx Sams BabossscTP BOCdwA HEd Sa) DAD) eos aleNS OxdEeso7VP HxD2S) DN) OHSS GrePx Bd Sots Bir0E& Sx 4OGd*S SB) Swwad) wodsar 40.197SHados* HwHrdo (wSrsS) PrBSASS SAY crore Bons BahEDS ergo 8 Hoss SoS” DSBtn HONBosS5)D BPS DorSeah SD08.[203-F-G, 204-C] 3. MASA DN) OHSS AnS) Ss¢ RDS Dxd) Bens SBsos? DOSo|BonodSA ePAoMSABS, OH ardary SSH SXoH HdomMwHAss wx SH SBOOS ers AP VQHSSA oA ARScoM DéwHo8 Garso ede scan aNODOHES MHD NonSHTOSNar wrrdds Oxo) Seo aga 37 80% showSho DAowmmrtht rar SdSx). [20 Scop ar @2706) KPADsaoS BoA Sond OSoBE HO) STPADA DA(Soo) So8a,11971) 82 ITR 363, S80Sak08. STP BX) OHSS, Ser LHSako asten SB Virb Des) c [1964] 7 SCR 148 Scio VES arroF wh EPBI)5 SB saPcdoyy Hxoy SMASH,AIR (1986) SC 757DBodsaDoewBd . DDS 09) BE OSS 48H: BHF25 So. 1396/1996 2 BAP) BPS BH 13.5.878 S.J.C30.52/1980 S aQyS Bd), 68cO DOG. ON BSS BSD B. 36.SA, odeomPrtd SYS. Ms. S0GP BLA LSchn Ms. Dead O§ abSn, HBaG S5s S.B. Spe r5, Dscdoa0949483 4902324) BODD
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan