Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Panchkula v....

Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Panchkula v. Dr. Mrs. Sonia Obero

High Court 25 Feb 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Panchkula v. Dr. Mrs. Sonia Obero
Date of order
25 Feb 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Panchkula v. Dr. Mrs. Sonia Obero, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest Present:Mr.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ITA No.115 of 2011Date of Decision:-25.2.72016 Commissioner of Income-tax, Panchkula Versus .... Appellant Dr. Mrs. Sonia Obero| respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANTHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PB. BAJANTHRI 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest Present:Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Akshay Bhan, Senior Advocate with.Mr. Alok Mittal, Advocate for the respondent. 0000 SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the appellant - revenue states thatsince tne tax Involved in the instant case IsL5,58,901/-, he does notwant to press the appeal in view of the circular dated 10.12.2015issued by the C.B.D.T., New Delhi. However, he prays that libertymay be granted to the revenue authorities to seek revival of theappeal, if need be. In this view of the matter, the instant appeal is dismissedas not pressed for leaving the question of law open to be adjudicatedin some appropriate case. (SURYA KANT)JUDGE February 25, 2016.sandeep sethi (P.B. BAJANTHRI)JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan