Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula v. Shri Jasjit Singh
High Court
09 Dec 2010 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula v. Shri Jasjit Singh
Date of order
09 Dec 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula v. Shri Jasjit Singh, the High Court (2010) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: 3.The point that arises in this appeal is whether the intereston enhanced compensation is taxable in the hands of the assessee inthe year of receipt.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ITA No. 418 of 2007
Date of Decision: 9.12.2010
Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula
Versus
Shri Jasjit Singh
....Appellant.
...Respondent.
CORAM:-HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL.HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL.
PRESENT: Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocate for the appellant.
None for the respondent.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.
1.This Court vide order dated December 17, 2007 hadadmitted the appeal for determination of the following substantialquestion of law:-
“Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case,the Tribunal was right in holding that the income byway of interest on enhanced compensation has notbeen determined so far when the assessee hasactually received the amount a long back?”
2.We have heard learned counsel for the appellant.
3.The point that arises in this appeal is whether the intereston enhanced compensation is taxable in the hands of the assessee inthe year of receipt.
ITA No. 418 of 2007-2-
4.The similar issue came up for consideration before thisCourt in ITA No. 209 of 2004 (The Commissioner of Income Tax,Faridabad v. Bir Singh (HUF) Ballabgarh) decided on 27.10.2010,wherein it was concluded as under:-
“(a)that 'income from Business or profession' and'income from other sources' are ascertain on thebasis of system of accountancy followed by theassessee;'income from other sources' are ascertain on thebasis of system of accountancy followed by theassessee;
(b)where assessee is not maintaining books of accountsby adopting any specific method, it shall be treated tobe cash system of accountancy;by adopting any specific method, it shall be treated tobe cash system of accountancy;
(c)the interest under Section 34 to be awarded by theCollector partakes the characters of compensationand is taxable in the year of receipt in view of Section45(5)(b) of the Act; and Collector partakes the characters of compensationand is taxable in the year of receipt in view of Section45(5)(b) of the Act; and
(d)under cash system of accountancy, the element ofinterest awarded by the Court received on enhancedamount of compensation under Section 28 of the1894 Act falls for taxation under Section 56 as'income from other sources' in the year of receipt.”interest awarded by the Court received on enhancedamount of compensation under Section 28 of the1894 Act falls for taxation under Section 56 as'income from other sources' in the year of receipt.”
5.In view of the above, the appeal is allowed and the questionof law is answered in favour of the revenue and against the assessee.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
December 9, 2010gbs
(ADARSH KUMAR GOEL)JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.