Case Law › High Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala v. D...

Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala v. Dcm Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. And Another

High Court 24 May 2017 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

24 May 2017

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala v. Dcm Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. And Another, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE, HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH. Company Appeal No. 27 of 2015Date of Decision: 24.05.2017 Commissioner of Income Tax, Patiala …..Appellant versus DCM Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. and another …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.J.VAZIFDAR, CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, JUDGE. Present : Mr. Zora Singh Klar, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. A.S.Chandhiok, Senior Advocate with Ms. Manmeet Arora, Advocate, Mr. Aashish Chopra, Advocate, Ms. Sweta Kakkad, Advocate and Mr. Anukrit Gupta, Advocate, for the respondents. **** SJ.VAZIFDAR, CHIEF JUSTICE For orders, see order of even date passed in Company AppealNo. 25 ot 2015 titled asM/s Pure Drinks (New Delhi) Ltd. through its’Director v. Income Tax Department through its Commissioner and another. (S.J. VAZIF DAR) CHIEF JUSTICE (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL)JUDGE 24th May, 2017ravinder| Whether speaking/reasonedWhether reportable Yes/No√ Yes/No√

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.