Commissioner Of Income Tax-Patiala v. State Bank Of Patiala
High Court
23 Jan 2020 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-Patiala v. State Bank Of Patiala
Date of order
23 Jan 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax-Patiala v. State Bank Of Patiala, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether speaking/ reasonedYes/No2.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA|AT CHANDIGARH
he f
ITA No. 259 of 2011 (O&M)Date of Decision: 23.01.2020
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-PATIALA
VERSUS
APPELLANT
STATE BANK OF PATIALA
RESPONDENT
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
Present:Mr. Jitin Kohli, Jr. Standing Counsel for
Mr. Kunal Sharma, Sr. Standing Counsel
for the appellant.
Mr. Sanjay Bansal, Senior Advocate with|Mr. Amit Parsad, Advocatefor the respondent.
AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral):
""""
For orders see order of the even date passed in ITA No. 195 of
2017, titled asThe Pr. Commissioner of IncomeFTax Patiala vs. State Bank
of Patiala.
IAJAY TEWARI]JUDGE
JIAVNEESH JHINGANJUDGE
January 23, 2020sham
1. Whether speaking/ reasonedYes/No2. Whether reportableYes/No
Yes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue