Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Pune v. Late S.n. Bahirat & Others
High Court
25 Jul 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Pune v. Late S.n. Bahirat & Others
Date of order
25 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
1979-80
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Pune v. Late S.n. Bahirat & Others, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Issue: At the instance of the Revenue, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has referred following question of law for the opinion of this Court. "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances and in law the assessee has been rightly considered as not liable to Capital gains in respect of lands sold by him ?"...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICITON
INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO.760 OF 1987
Commissioner of Income-tax, Pune .. Applicant.
Versus
Late S.N. Bahirat & Others .. Respondents.
Mr.Ashok Kotangale for the applicant.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 25TH JULY, 2007.
P.C. :
1. At the instance of the Revenue, the Income
Tax Appellate Tribunal has referred following
question of law for the opinion of this Court.
"Whether on the facts and in the
circumstances and in law the assessee has
been rightly considered as not liable to
Capital gains in respect of lands sold by
him ?"
2. On perusal of the case, it is seen that the
reference relates to the case of several assessees
relating to the assessment year 1979-80 and 1980-81.
The cumulative tax effect in all the aforesaid
assessment years in the case of each of the assessee
is less than Rs.4,00,000/-.
3. In the light of the Board’s circular dated
5th June, 2007 issued in the light of the decision
2
of this Court in the case of CIT V/s. Vitessee
Trading Ltd. dated 23-04-2007 in Income Tax Appeal
(L) No.118 of 2003, the reference is returned
unanswered.
(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.