Commissioner Of Income Tax Raipur Raipur C.g v. Ku. Neha Puri
High Court
26 Mar 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax Raipur Raipur C.g v. Ku. Neha Puri
Date of order
26 Mar 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax Raipur Raipur C.g v. Ku. Neha Puri, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
26/03/2015
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCC No. 596 of 2013
1. Commissioner Of Income Tax Raipur Raipur C.G.
---- Applicant
Versus
1. Ku. Neha Puri D/o Vijay Kumar Puri I.R.S. Commissioner Of Central Excise (Appeal) Central Excise Building, Dhamtari Road, Tikrapara, Raipur C.G.(Appeal) Central Excise Building, Dhamtari Road, Tikrapara, Raipur C.G.
---- Respondent
For Applicant:No one appears.For Respondent :No one appears
Hon'ble Shri Justice T. P. SharmaHon'ble Shri Justice Inder Singh Uboweja
Order On Board by T.P.Sharma, J.
No one appears for the applicant even in second round when the case is calledout for hearing nor any representation is made on behalf of the appellant.
2.This is an application for restoration of I.T.A.No.32/2007 dismissed as timebarred vide order dated 30[th] June, 2009 on the ground that law in the subject matter hasbeen amended
3.Registry has pointed out the defaults. Having perused M.C.C., we do not findany ground to entertain the present in view of change in law. Therefore, M.C.C. isdismissed summarily reserving the liberty to the applicant to file appropriate petition inthe light of change in law.
4.No order as to costs.
JUDGE
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.