In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Raipur v. M/S. Amolak Singh & Co., Bilaspur, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.In this circumstances, we are left with no other option except to dismiss the ITR for want of prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Bini
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR I.T.R. No. 22 of 1998
Commissioner of Income Tax, Raipur
---- Applicant
Versus
M/s. Amolak Singh & Co., Bilaspur.
---- Respondent
For appellantFor Respondent/
: None present: Shri Abhishek Sinha
Hon'ble Shri Justice Pritinker DiwakerHon'ble Shri Justice Chandra Bhushan Bajpai
Order On Board
Per P. Diwaker, J
22.08.2016.
None appears for the applicant even when the case is taken up
for hearing in the second round.
2.In this circumstances, we are left with no other option except to
dismiss the ITR for want of prosecution.
3.Accordingly, the ITR is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/-
Sd/-
(Pritinker Diwaker) (Chandra Bhushan Bajpai)
JUDGE JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue