Case Law › High Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax, Raipur v. M/...

Commissioner Of Income Tax, Raipur v. M/S Dayal Moghji And Co. Malviya Road,Raipur

High Court 10 May 2013 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · cghccisdb

Parties

Date of order

10 May 2013

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Raipur v. M/S Dayal Moghji And Co. Malviya Road,Raipur, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

ff/" ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR D.B.:HON'BLE MR. SUNIL KUMAR SINHA &HON'BLE MR. RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR, JJ.HON'BLE MR. RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR, JJ. M.C.C.NO. 1154/2012 APPLICANT Commissioner of Income Tax, Raipur -T Versus -<\ RESPONDENTS M/s Dayal Moghji and Co. Malviya Road,Raipur. APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION Appearance: Mr. Anand Dadariya, Advocate for the Applicant. ORDER (10/05/2013) Heard. Mr. Anand Dadariya, learned counsel for the Applicant, makes statement thatinadvertently instead of filing a review petition, the applicant has filed MCC makingprayer for restoration of the original Income Text Appeal (ITA), therefore, this MCC^nay be permitted to be withdrawn as the applicant would file a duly constitutedreview petition. M.C.C. No. 1154/2013 for restoration, therefore, is disposed of as withdrawn. Sd/-R.N. ChandrakarJudge Sd/-Sunil Kumar SinhaJudge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.