In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ranchi v. For The, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: 06 Dated: 18 1.This appeal is admitted for final hearing and will be heard on the following substantial question of law: Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Hon'ble ITAT failed to consider that all the additions made by A.O are based on the materials and evidences seized during t...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
VK/Ajay
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Tax Appeal No.24 of 2006
Commissioner of Income Tax, Ranchi ...... Appellant
Versus
Smt. Pratima Prasad
…… Respondent
---------
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. PATEL
---------
For the Appellant: Mr. Deepak Roshan, Advocate
For the Respondent
: --
---------
th November, 2013
Order No. 06
Dated: 18
1.This appeal is admitted for final hearing and will be heard on the
following substantial question of law:
Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Hon'ble ITAT failed to consider that all the additions made by A.O are based on the materials and evidences seized during the search as such failed to consider the provisions of Section 132 (4A) of the Income Tax Act. 1961?
2.The matter shall be listed in regular course.
3.Paper book shall be prepared by the Registry of this Court, as required
under Rules 190 and 191 of the High Court of Jharkhand Rules, 2001.
(R. Banumathi, C.J.)
(D.N. Patel, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.