Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ranchi …… v....

Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ranchi …… v. Late Ratan Lal Jain

High Court 18 Jan 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jhar_pg
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ranchi …… v. Late Ratan Lal Jain
Date of order
18 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ranchi …… v. Late Ratan Lal Jain, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.

Issue: (ii)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the ratio of judgment reported in 254 ITR 68 in the case of New Punjab Skin Co. vs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Tax Appeal No. 5 of 2005 Commissioner of Income Tax, Ranchi …… Appellant Versus Late Ratan Lal Jain through its Legal Heir Smt. Bimla Devi Jain …… Respondent --------- CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. PATEL --------- For the Appellant: Mr. Deepak Roshan, AdvocateFor the Respondents: Mr. Shresth Gautam, Advocate--------- th November, 2013 Order No. 09Dated: 18 1.This appeal is admitted for final hearing and will be heard on the following substantial questions of law:following substantial questions of law: (i)Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case the ITAT was right in affirming the order of CIT(A) who in turn held that the provisions of Section 158 BFA (1) is not mandatory?right in affirming the order of CIT(A) who in turn held that the provisions of Section 158 BFA (1) is not mandatory? (ii)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the ratio of judgment reported in 254 ITR 68 in the case of New Punjab Skin Co. vs. Union of India and others is squarely applicable in the facts and circumstances of the case?of judgment reported in 254 ITR 68 in the case of New Punjab Skin Co. vs. Union of India and others is squarely applicable in the facts and circumstances of the case? (iii)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case ITAT was right in directing the assessing officer not to initiate penalty proceeding when no cause of appeal arose?right in directing the assessing officer not to initiate penalty proceeding when no cause of appeal arose? 2.Learned counsel for the respondent shall file counter affidavit. 3.The matter shall be listed in regular course. 4.Paper book shall be prepared by the Registry of this Court, as required under Rules 190 and 191 of the High Court of Jharkhand Rules, 2001. (R. Banumathi, C.J.) (D.N. Patel, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan