Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ranchi v. Sri Tejinder Singh
High Court
12 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jhar_pg
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ranchi v. Sri Tejinder Singh
Date of order
12 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ranchi v. Sri Tejinder Singh, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Tax Appeal No. 12 of 2007
Commissioner of Income Tax, Ranchi
...... Appellant
Versus
Sri Tejinder Singh
...... Respondent
--------
CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.PATEL
--------
For the appellant:Mr. Deepak Roshan, Advocate
Order No. 06
Dated 20th November, 2013
1. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the defect, which is pointed out by the office, is about the oath number, which was administered by the Advocate, who was Oath Commissioner. pointed out by the office, is about the oath number, which was administered by the Advocate, who was Oath Commissioner.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant further submitted that the oath number is still missing and the appellant is unable to point out the said number and, therefore, the Commissioner of Income Tax is ready to file fresh affidavit, for which some time may be granted. number is still missing and the appellant is unable to point out the said number and, therefore, the Commissioner of Income Tax is ready to file fresh affidavit, for which some time may be granted.
3. Time, as prayed for, is granted. The fresh affidavit must be filed within three week from today, failing which the memo of appeal shall be deemed to have been dismissed automatically. If fresh affidavit is filed, the same will be treated as removal of defect. three week from today, failing which the memo of appeal shall be deemed to have been dismissed automatically. If fresh affidavit is filed, the same will be treated as removal of defect.
4. Rest two defects shall also be removed by the appellant meanwhile. If these defects are also not removed within the said time, this appeal shall be deemed to have been dismissed automatically. these defects are also not removed within the said time, this appeal shall be deemed to have been dismissed automatically.
( R. Banumathi, C.J. )
( D. N. Patel, J. )
A.K.Verma/
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.