Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ro v. M/S.bhiwani Vanaspati Ltd
High Court
25 Jul 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ro v. M/S.bhiwani Vanaspati Ltd
Date of order
25 Jul 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ro v. M/S.bhiwani Vanaspati Ltd, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
2024:PHHC:094141-DB ITC-36-1999 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.07.2024
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RO
. . . . Petitioner
Vs.
M/S.BHIWANI VANASPATI LTD.
. . . . Respondent
****
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH ****
Present None.
****
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral)
1.This is a file placed by the registry informing that the record of the file was fully burnt in fire, whereafter notices were sent to the concerned parties to reconstitute the file, but no response has been received from either side. fully burnt in fire, whereafter notices were sent to the concerned parties to reconstitute the file, but no response has been received from either side.
2.In view of above, we find that the present ITC cannot be decided by the Court on merits on the lack of documents. on merits on the lack of documents.
3.Accordingly, ITC is dismissed for non-prosecution.
4.All pending applications also stand disposed of.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE
(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE
July 25, 2024 Mohit goyal
1. Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No2. Whether reportable? Yes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.