Commissioner Of Income Tax - Rohtak v. O.p.jindal Global University, Sonepat
High Court
02 May 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax - Rohtak v. O.p.jindal Global University, Sonepat
Date of order
02 May 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax - Rohtak v. O.p.jindal Global University, Sonepat, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
ITA No.282 of 2012(O&M)Date of decision: 02.05.2013
Commissioner of Income Tax - Rohtak
Versus
O.P.Jindal Global University, Sonepat
.... Appellant
.... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTAHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present: Mr. Inderpreet Singh, Advocatefor the appellant.
*****
HEMANT GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
The present appeal has been filed under Section 260-A ofthe Income Tax Act-1961 against the order dated 29.02.2012 passedby Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in respect of application dated09.11.2010 for exemption under Section 80(G)(5) of the Act.
The assessee had been found entitled to exemption underSection 80G(5) of the Act vide order dated 02.05.2013 passed in ITANo.285 of 2012 titled as O.P.Jindal Global University, Sonepatvs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Rohtak, on the basis of earlierapplication of such exemption dated 11.05.2009, therefore the presentappeal does not give rise to any substantial question of law in terms ofthe reasons recorded in the said appeal.
Dismissed.
(Hemant Gupta)Judge
(Ritu Bahri) Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue