Commissioner Of Income Tax Shimla v. Ita
High Court
25 Feb 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax Shimla v. Ita
Date of order
25 Feb 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax Shimla v. Ita, the High Court (2014) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: Whether approved for reporting ?[1]For the appellant(s):Mr.
Decision: Accordingly, both the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment referred to supra; the same shall form part of this judgment.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
ITA No. 4016 & 4017 of 2013.
Date of decision: 25.02.2014
1. ITA No. 4016/2013.
Commissioner of Income Tax Shimla
…..Appellant
Versus
Jai Prakash Hydro Power Ventures Ltd. …Respondent
2.ITA No. 4017/2013.
Commissioner of Income Tax Shimla
Versus
Jai Prakash Hydro Power Ventures Ltd.
…..Appellant
…Respondent
Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, ACJ.The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J.
Whether approved for reporting ?[1]For the appellant(s):Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Sr. Advocate, and Ms. Vandana Kuthiala, Advocate.
For the respondent(s):
Mr. Vishal Mohan, Advocate.
_______________________________________________________
Mansoor Ahmad Mir, A.C.J. (Oral)
The learned counsel for the parties stated at the Bar that the substantial questions of law involved in both the appeals stand already determined by this Court in ITA Nos. 28 and 29 of 2012-B, vide judgment dated 16.5.2013. Their statements are taken on record. The photocopy of the judgment passed in ITA Nos. 28 and 29 of 2012-B has also been produced. The same is taken on record and made part of the file.
2. We have gone through the appeals and the judgment referred to supra. In our considered view, the
1Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?.
matter is covered by the aforementioned judgment. Accordingly, both the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment referred to supra; the same shall form
part of this judgment.
( Mansoor Ahmad Mir ) Acting Chief Justice.
February 25, 2014, (cmt/krt)
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.