Commissioner Of Income Tax, Shimla v. M/S Solan District Truck Operators Transport Co-Operative Society
High Court
21 Sep 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Shimla v. M/S Solan District Truck Operators Transport Co-Operative Society
Date of order
21 Sep 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Shimla v. M/S Solan District Truck Operators Transport Co-Operative Society, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether approved for reporting? .
Decision: In view of the above stated position, both the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment passed by this Court in ITA No.27 of 2006, supra, which shall form part of this judgment also.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
ITA No.70 of 2008 with ITA No.74 of 2008.Decided on: September 21, 2015.
1. ITA No.70 of 2008:
Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla
…….Appellant.
versus
M/s Solan District Truck Operators Transport Co-operative Society
………..Respondent.
2. ITA No.74 of 2008:
Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla
…….Appellant.
versus
M/s Ambuja Darla Kashlog Mangu Transport Co-op. Society Ltd.
………..Respondent.
___________________________________________________________________
Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting? .
For the Appellant(s): Mr.Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate, with Ms.Vandana Kuthiala, Advocate. For the Respondent(s): Mr.Ashish Jamalta, Advocate, vice Mr.Goverdhan Sharma, Advocate.
____________________________________________________________
Mansoor Ahmad Mir, C.J.
Ms.Vandana Kuthiala, learned counsel for the appellant(s), filed across the Board a copy of the letter, dated 11[th]/12[th] May, 2015, received from the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Railway Board Building, Shimla, made part of the file. Ms.Kuthiala stated that the
appeal filed before the Apex Court has been dismissed and the judgment, dated 16[th] November, 2009, passed by this Court in ITA No.27 of 2006, has been upheld. She further stated that the issue involved in these appeals is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court passed in ITA No.27 of 2006, supra and these appeals may be disposed of in terms of the said judgment. Her statement is taken on record.
2. In view of the above stated position, both the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment passed by this Court in ITA No.27 of 2006, supra, which shall form part of this judgment also.
(Mansoor Ahmad Mir) Chief Justice.
September 21, 2015. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge.
(Tilak)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.