Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax, Shimla v. M/...

Commissioner Of Income Tax, Shimla v. M/S.steinle Machine Fabric India, Dhalli, Shimla

High Court 26 Feb 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Shimla v. M/S.steinle Machine Fabric India, Dhalli, Shimla
Date of order
26 Feb 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Shimla v. M/S.steinle Machine Fabric India, Dhalli, Shimla, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Decision: The appeal is disposed of as having become infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA I.T.A No. 37 of 2005 Date of decision: 26.2.2011 Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla. …. Appellant Versus M/s.Steinle Machine Fabric India, Dhalli, Shimla Coram: ….. Respondent The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, J. The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Sanjay Karol, J. Whether approved for reporting? No For the appellant: Ms.Vandana Kuthiala, Advocate For the respondent: Mr.Vishal Mohan, Advocate Deepak Gupta, J.(Oral) In view of the averments made in the supplementary affidavit filed by the appellant pursuant to the directions of this Court dated 1.6.2010, it is apparent that the fresh assessment has been drawn up against the assessee and the assessee has challenged the same in separate proceedings. Therefore, the assessment in these proceedings does not survive and the appeal itself has become infructuous. The appeal is disposed of as having become infructuous. ( Deepak Gupta ) Judge February 26, 2011 (Sanjay Karol) (m) Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan