Commissioner Of Income Tax, Shimla v. Sh. Naresh Kumar Aggarwal
High Court
13 May 2015 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Shimla v. Sh. Naresh Kumar Aggarwal
Date of order
13 May 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Shimla v. Sh. Naresh Kumar Aggarwal, the High Court (2015) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: Whether approved for reporting?[1] No.
Decision: Accordingly this appeal is disposed of in terms of the judgment (supra), which shall form part of this judgment also.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
ITA No. 5 of 2014
Decided on: 13[th] May, 2015
Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla
.......Appellant
Versus
Sh. Naresh Kumar Aggarwal.
...Respondent.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dharam Chand Chaudhary, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?[1] No.
For the appellant: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate.
For the respondent: Mr. Vishal Mohan, Advocate.
Dharam Chand Chaudhary, Judge.(Oral)
Issue notice. Mr. Vishal Mohan, Advocate, waives notice on behalf of the respondent. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant stated at the Bar that this case is squarely covered by the judgment, dated September 10, 2014 rendered by this Court in a batch of appeals, ITA No. 17 of 2010, titled as
1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
Commissioner of Income Taxversus Pawan Aggarwal,
being the lead case. His statement is taken on record. 3. Accordingly this appeal is disposed of in terms of the judgment (supra), which shall form part of this judgment also.
(Dharam Chand Chaudhary)
Judge
May 13, 2015 (naveen)
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.