Commissioner Of Income Tax, Tds-1 v. M/S Indian News Paper Society
High Court
08 Aug 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Tds-1 v. M/S Indian News Paper Society
Date of order
08 Aug 2016
Assessment year(s)
2008-09
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Tds-1 v. M/S Indian News Paper Society, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Although the appeal would fail on the ground of delay, the Court also notices that the question of law sought to be urged is whether the amount assessed as income in the hands of the assessee, on account of additional deposit made for securing FSI, is no longer resintegra.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~39
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ ITA 575/2016 & C.M.Nos.28453-28454/2016
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS-1 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Rahul Chaudhary and Mr.Raghvendra Singh, Advocates
versus
M/S INDIAN NEWS PAPER SOCIETY ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sunil Fernandes, Ms.Mithu Jain and Mr.Deepak Pathak, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI O R D E R% 08.08.2016
1.We are informed that the appeal was earlier under diary no.144135/2014 by another counsel. It was re-filed under the current diary/registration number by the present signing counsel.
2. In view of the order, the earlier diary no.144135/2014 is directed to be deleted.
3.This appeal is hopelessly time barred. The Revenue has preferred it under section 260-A of the Income Tax Act and after delay of 710 days.
4. Although the appeal would fail on the ground of delay, the Court also notices that the question of law sought to be urged is whether the amount assessed as income in the hands of the assessee, on account of additional deposit made for securing FSI, is no longer resintegra. It is covered by a previous judgment of this Court in
Commissioner of Income Tax-TDS vs. the Indian Paper Society (for –AY 2008-09 and 2010-11) in ITA Nos.918/2015 & 920/2015 decided on 10.12.2015. The Court had held as under:
8. ......As far as the present case is concerned, the facts brought on record, and which have not been contested by the Revenue, unmistakably show that the payment of the lease premium for the land given on lease to the Assessee for a period of 80 years with “all the rights, easements and appurtenances” was in the nature of a capital expenditure. This coupled with the fact that the MMRDA did not treat the receipt as income clinches the issue in favour of the Assessee and against the Revenue.”
5.dismissed along with the pending applications.
For the above reasons, we find no merit in the appeal. It is
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
AUGUST 08, 2016 rb
NAJMI WAZIRI, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.