Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax (T.d.s.) Jaip...

Commissioner Of Income Tax (T.d.s.) Jaipur, Statute Circle, C-Scheme, Jaipur v. M/S Eid Mohd. Nizamuddin, Subhash Bazar, Tonk Road,Rajasthan

High Court 08 Apr 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax (T.d.s.) Jaipur, Statute Circle, C-Scheme, Jaipur v. M/S Eid Mohd. Nizamuddin, Subhash Bazar, Tonk Road,Rajasthan
Date of order
08 Apr 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax (T.d.s.) Jaipur, Statute Circle, C-Scheme, Jaipur v. M/S Eid Mohd. Nizamuddin, Subhash Bazar, Tonk Road,Rajasthan, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal under Section 5 of the Income-tax Act. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Misc. Income Tax Application No. 2635/2024 In D.B. Civil Income Tax Misc. Restoration Application No.1170/2024 In D.B. Civil Income Tax appeal No.29/2019 Commissioner Of Income Tax (T.d.s.) Jaipur, Statute Circle, C-Scheme, Jaipur. ----Applicant-appellant Versus M/s Eid Mohd. Nizamuddin, Subhash Bazar, Tonk Road,Rajasthan. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aditya Dosa, Adv. on behalf of Mr. Shantanu Sharma, Adv.For Respondent(s): HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT 08/04/2025 Order Heard on the application under Section 5 of the LimitationAct for condonation of delay in filing the restoration application. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same isallowed. Delay in filing the restoration application is condoned. (MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J(INDERJEET SINGH),J JYOTI /65
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan