Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds v. Chief Manager Punjab National Bank
High Court
23 May 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds v. Chief Manager Punjab National Bank
Date of order
23 May 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds v. Chief Manager Punjab National Bank, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr.
Decision: Consequently, the present petition does not fall within the ambit of Order 47 Rule 1 CPC and the same is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Rev. Petition No. 52 of 2016
Date of Decision: 23.5.2016
Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS)
Versus
…Petitioner
Chief Manager Punjab National Bank
…Respondents
_____________________________________ ______________________CoramHon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar Thakur, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Ms. Vandana Kuthiala, Advocate. For the respondents : Nemo.
Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral):
CMP(M) No. 592 of 2016
Heard.
In view of the grounds taken in the application duly supported by an affidavit and in the interest of justice, delay in filing the present review petition is condoned. The application stands disposed of.
Rev. Petition No. 52 of 2016
There is no error apparent on the face of record.
Consequently, the present petition does not fall within the ambit of Order 47 Rule 1 CPC and the same is dismissed. No costs.
(Rajiv Sharma), Judge
May 23, 2016 (kalpana)
(Sureshwar Thakur), Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue