Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax Tds v. Mother...

Commissioner Of Income Tax Tds v. Mother Dairy Foods Processing Ltd

High Court 12 Jan 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax Tds v. Mother Dairy Foods Processing Ltd
Date of order
12 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax Tds v. Mother Dairy Foods Processing Ltd, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed both on the grounds of ITA 66/2016 Page 1 of 2 extraordinary delay in re-filing the appeal as well as on merits.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 11. + ITA 66/2016 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TDS ..... Appellant Through: Mr P. Roy Chaudhuri and Ms Lakshmi Gurung, Advocates. Through: Mr P. Roy Chaudhuri and Ms Lakshmi Gurung, Advocates. versus MOTHER DAIRY FOODS PROCESSING LTD. ..... Respondent Through CORAM:JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R% 12.01.2016 CM No.985/2016 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The application stands disposed of. ITA 66/2016 & CM No.984/2016 3. There is an extraordinary delay of 807 days in re-filing the appeal. Nevertheless, even on merits, it is stated that the questions urged in this appeal are covered against the Revenue by the decision of this Court dated 30[th] January, 2012 in ITA No.1925/2010 (CIT v. Mother Diary India Ltd.) 4. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed both on the grounds of ITA 66/2016 Page 1 of 2 extraordinary delay in re-filing the appeal as well as on merits. S.MURALIDHAR, J JANUARY 12, 2016 MK VIBHU BAKHRU, J ITA 66/2016 Page 2 of 2
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan