Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds v. State Bank Of Patiala
High Court
17 Mar 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds v. State Bank Of Patiala
Date of order
17 Mar 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds v. State Bank Of Patiala, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Decision: 3.In view of the above, this appeal is disposed of interms of the judgment in ITA No.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
ITA No. 18 of 2014
Decided on: 17.03.2016
Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS)
…Appellant.
Versus
State Bank of Patiala
…Respondent.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice.The Hon'ble Mr. Justice P.S. Rana, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?
For the appellant: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate,with Ms. Vandana Kuthiala, Advocate.For the respondent:Mr. Aditya Sood, Advocate, vice Mr.Vishal Mohan, Advocate.
Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice.(Oral)
Mr. Aditya Sood, learned proxy counsel appearingon behalf of the respondent, stated at the Bar that the case issquarely covered by the judgment, dated 31[st] December, 2014,made by this Court in ITA No. 17 of 2014, titled asCommissioner of Income Tax (TDS), Chandigarh versus
State Bank of Patiala Sectt. Shimla. His statement is
taken on record.
2.He has also produced copy of the judgment in ITA
No. 17 of 2014 across the Board, made part of the file.
3.In view of the above, this appeal is disposed of interms of the judgment in ITA No. 17 of 2014, which shall formpart of this judgment also.
4.Pending applications, if any, are also disposed ofaccordingly.
(Mansoor Ahmad Mir) Chief Justice
March 17, 2016
( rajni )
(P.S. Rana) Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.