Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur v. Date Of Order ::: 24.01.2012
High Court
24 Jan 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur v. Date Of Order ::: 24.01.2012
Date of order
24 Jan 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur v. Date Of Order ::: 24.01.2012, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly and in view of the foregoing discussion,the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR.
D. B. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.140/2011
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, UDAIPUR V. SMT. KAUSHAYLA DEVI JHANWAR.
DATE OF ORDER ::: 24.01.2012
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. M. SAPREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. M. TOTLA
Mr. K.K.Bissa, for Appellant (s).
BY THE COURT:
This appeal is filed under Section 260-A of the IncomeTax Act, 1961 against the judgement dated 27.10.2009passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JodhpurBench, Jodhpur in ITA No.343/JU/2008.
Although this appeal was admitted for final hearing on28.04.2011 by framing the substantial question of law onmerits, but, now it is brought to our notice by an applicationmade by the appellant (IA No.577/2012) that respondentassessee died during pendency of appeal before Tribunal.
We have also noticed that the assessee died on17.09.2008 as per averments made in the application underconsideration, whereas impugned order of the Tribunal waspassed on 27.10.2009, i.e., after the death of assessee.
In these circumstances, we are of the opinion thatproper course open to the appellant, at this stage, would be
to withdraw this appeal and make appropriate applicationbefore the Tribunal in the said appeal, bringing to theirnotice the factum of death of assessee during the pendencyof the appeal before the Tribunal.
Once this information is brought to the notice of theTribunal by making proper application in that regard by theappellant, who was also appellant before the Tribunal, thenthe appropriate orders for recalling the order passed in thecase of a dead person will have to be passed by theTribunal.
We accordingly grant this liberty and allow theappellant to withdraw this appeal for taking necessary stepsbefore the Tribunal by making a proper application in thatregard.
Accordingly and in view of the foregoing discussion,the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
(C. M. TOTLA), J. (A.M.SAPRE), J.
scd
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.